Skip to main content

Magnificent or draggy?


It is that time of the year when you have a ‘Live’ cricket match everyday; it is that time of the year when popular VJs discuss and analyze cricket rather than the familiar cricket hosts; it is that time of the year when you and your friend don’t necessarily cheer for the same side! The IPL is round the corner; promising to be back to its usual self - extravagant and glamorous.

Along with the cricket the big focus would be on whether the brand IPL can revive itself after a below-par performance last season. With a poor international season (for India) preceding and no home matches for the last 4 & half months, the levels of interest and following should be expected to rise; at least better the abysmal stats for last year. The availability of majority of India’s international players should not only encourage the respective sides but also the competition itself.

70-odd matches, 2 months is the extent of this edition. It appears too long to crop up the fatigue factor and bore followers, but like we have seen for the last 4 years that this is not a relevant reason, unless your side isn’t winning! But like a meal to become good, the main course has to be up to the mark; the starters and desserts can add to it but cannot be the main thing! The quality of cricket has been a key to IPL’s success; the equal distribution of talent and ability across all teams ensures that no team starts the tournament as an underdog. IPL-V starts off with a lot of swaps/new buys and redistribution of team compositions. It would be very interesting to see how the teams’ fare with the new look squads and how fans react to these changes.

The bigger picture suggests that this edition of the IPL is an indicative tourney to gauge form and ability leading up to the T20 World Cup; most of the foreign players would be participating with this motive as well. India’s T20 form hasn’t been the greatest since that memorable win in Johannesburg 5 years ago. The selectors, media and the public would be eyeing the IPL from that perspective as well. The Indian players would be competing after a longish international season and even more tiring after the team hasn’t won too much. It would be a test of their fitness physically as well as mentally. The timing of the IPL has been criticized for it occupies the lay-off period for Indian players that it was before the advent of IPL.

Broadcasters, advertisers, investors, team owners and the BCCI would be hoping for a ‘profitable’ season; fans would be hoping for a close season - in terms of results. A glossy opening ceremony is being planned for, but the success of the tourney or the lack of it will ultimately boil down to the competitiveness of the participating teams. This edition has the potential to go both ways - revive itself with the zest with which it began or continue to wear out. IPL-V will have answers to most of these queries, let us sit back and witness how that unfolds!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adieu Rahul Dravid

It could have been timed better, it could have come a little later, it could have been better celebrated but the retirement was always going to come some day. It is easier said than fathomed - the Indian test side without Dravid! The news on first instance was a moment of disbelief, followed by a moment of daze before logic struck saying that it had to come and the moment had indeed arrived. Dravid was never a glamorous character on or off the field, more of a thorough gentleman commanding respect from all quarters. His announcement was synonymous with his usual self - calm, composed, dignified and non-fussy. Dravid was, is and will always be remembered as a role model for his conduct, dignity, selflessness  on the cricket field & off it  along-with his technically impeccable batting. On the global scene the game has lost one of its modern-day great and an all-time legend. The clock was ticking for Dravid much before, but an exceptional tour of England postponed this event (

Should Cricket Embrace The 5 Rings?

Another glorious edition of the Olympics goes into the sunset. A couple of weeks that showcased the best athletes compete for the ultimate glory, an event that exhibited disappointment, defeat, joy, pride, victory, glory and a portrait that had participation from 204 nations! A rich history, a massive platform, unparalleled glory and probably the biggest show sports can offer, makes an Olympic Games edition stand out. Ardent cricket fans/followers would feel left out from this marquee sports event. Unlike Motorsports, Cricket is a recognized by the International Olympic Committee. Though cricket wasn’t an outright success in multi-sport models previously, times have changed and today cricket has its T20 avatar to offer for such events. The ICC has 105 countries as its recognized members, spanning continents and covering most of the globe.

India's problems begin from the top!

The middle order of India’s batting line-up has been the focus of all the criticism in the last couple of months. Amidst this chatter, an aspect of India’s success over the last decade or so - the opening has been a bit neglected. Yes the middle order deserves all the flak and resurrection in that department should be executed with priority but you cannot overlook the constant failure of the openers to deliver what is expected of them. Sehwag & Gambhir has been India’s best opening combine in terms of runs and also the longest serving duo. When you have the same pair at the top, you either don’t have too many options or they are doing too well to disturb; 23 opening stands of 50 or more & 10 stands of 100+ out of 76 outings is a reasonable stat and should endorse the latter view. Dissect that stat a bit and a few creepy things crop up. The duo has managed to provide an opening stand of 100 or more only on 3 occasions out of 34 times they have gone out to open the batting on