Skip to main content

Chasing Targets: A Thought-Out Plan Or An Option-less Policy?

7 (out of 21) is the number of ODIs India has managed to win in the season whose conclusion precedes India's title defence in about 10 months. With 0.63 India's win-loss ratio is the second worst among the top 8 teams in this period. This may appear an isolated sample space but more than the numerical values the manner in which they have been rendered has yielded greater concern. Poor string of results invokes criticism but established names tend to command time, unlike the present situation where questions are being raised about ability and position in the side.

Though such rhetoric carry higher emotional quotient, the common line of reaction assumes greater weight as time and the number of opportunities between now and February 2015 are limited. Barring a couple of names, India's core group has remained intact in the shorter formats over the last couple of years, with reasonable individual & collective success; albeit in patches. Thus deliberating upon this aspect of introspection may not converge into a substantial outcome. Rather modifying policies to maximize efficient output from available resources may be the smarter way ahead.

One such habit which the team may have to reflect upon is its apparent rigid policy of batting second. In the 21 ODIs this season, the Indian skipper won the toss 12 times and chose to bat second on 11 such instances. While this stat conveniently camouflages local effects of pitch, weather, opposition & context, it provides a fair idea on how the team management is drafting its SWOT analysis. 

To say that India's batting is its strength is to say the sun rises from the east. In the 90s and early 2000s the team preferred to utilize its stronger arm to set targets. In an era when patterns of scoring were defined & followed this policy worked for most sides. Turn of the century, T20 cricket, flatter & truer decks, batting depths and the 434 chase coincided to make chasing targets a fancied option over the last 6-8 years. The Dravid-Chappell duo ensured that India moved with the changing times and cultivated the habit of batting second. It bore fruits in the 2nd half of the previous decade and India became a more complete ODI outfit; culminating with the World Cup success.

Call it overdoing or anything else but bowling first has become India's modus operandi rather than a preferred option in the last couple of seasons. While this reiterates lesser confidence in bowlers, it permits the batsmen's confidence to flirt with over-confidence. With recent performances you sense that both the batsmen & bowlers are habituated with this game-plan and appear out of their comfort zones when the reverse situation is encountered. 

Hypothecate India playing the World Cup semifinal having to bat first on a flattish deck. The margins of error are thin in such matches and unfamiliarity may be a bigger challenge than the burden of that match itself. Batsmen may suddenly find it difficult to gauge the par score for the track and bowling at crunch moments does well when it has had thorough prior experience rather than simulated practice at other levels. Another consequence of this habit is the subtle development of the jaane-do attitude in the field by backing the batsmen to chase any total. Not only does that diminish the intent of the bowlers, but also dents the active movement in the field.

To be fair to Dhoni & the team management, given India's bowling prowess and the track record of chasing improbable totals, it is not hard to find why fielding first is its first choice. Dhoni has seen glory and gloom at the helm, and in some ways has been a key component of both these phases. Having seen what works and what doesn't, it shouldn't surprise if it is revealed later about this approach being a deliberate attempt to plug loopholes alike the manner in which it was done in the mid-2000s. If this isn't true, there are serious reasons to diminish hopes from this side for the World Cup next year as this policy makes the side appear amputated; not only in terms of game-plan but in the mindset as well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Cricket Embrace The 5 Rings?

Another glorious edition of the Olympics goes into the sunset. A couple of weeks that showcased the best athletes compete for the ultimate glory, an event that exhibited disappointment, defeat, joy, pride, victory, glory and a portrait that had participation from 204 nations! A rich history, a massive platform, unparalleled glory and probably the biggest show sports can offer, makes an Olympic Games edition stand out. Ardent cricket fans/followers would feel left out from this marquee sports event. Unlike Motorsports, Cricket is a recognized by the International Olympic Committee. Though cricket wasn’t an outright success in multi-sport models previously, times have changed and today cricket has its T20 avatar to offer for such events. The ICC has 105 countries as its recognized members, spanning continents and covering most of the globe.

Adieu Rahul Dravid

It could have been timed better, it could have come a little later, it could have been better celebrated but the retirement was always going to come some day. It is easier said than fathomed - the Indian test side without Dravid! The news on first instance was a moment of disbelief, followed by a moment of daze before logic struck saying that it had to come and the moment had indeed arrived. Dravid was never a glamorous character on or off the field, more of a thorough gentleman commanding respect from all quarters. His announcement was synonymous with his usual self - calm, composed, dignified and non-fussy. Dravid was, is and will always be remembered as a role model for his conduct, dignity, selflessness  on the cricket field & off it  along-with his technically impeccable batting. On the global scene the game has lost one of its modern-day great and an all-time legend. The clock was ticking for Dravid much before, but an exceptional tour of England postponed this event (

India's problems begin from the top!

The middle order of India’s batting line-up has been the focus of all the criticism in the last couple of months. Amidst this chatter, an aspect of India’s success over the last decade or so - the opening has been a bit neglected. Yes the middle order deserves all the flak and resurrection in that department should be executed with priority but you cannot overlook the constant failure of the openers to deliver what is expected of them. Sehwag & Gambhir has been India’s best opening combine in terms of runs and also the longest serving duo. When you have the same pair at the top, you either don’t have too many options or they are doing too well to disturb; 23 opening stands of 50 or more & 10 stands of 100+ out of 76 outings is a reasonable stat and should endorse the latter view. Dissect that stat a bit and a few creepy things crop up. The duo has managed to provide an opening stand of 100 or more only on 3 occasions out of 34 times they have gone out to open the batting on