Skip to main content

Time For Parity Between Bat & Ball!

The success of World Cup 2015 has fostered the resurgence of the 50-overs format in addition to the World Cup of 2011 and the Champions Trophy in 2013 in the recent years. The tournament was decorated with sparkling batting knocks, dominative bowling spells, low-scoring thrillers, a tantalising semi-final and the top teams showcasing their A-game, albeit in patches. The quadrennial event often signifies different things to different players and teams, and the performances therein provide basis to project the progress of the format till the succeeding edition. Likewise, the big talking point rendered during this edition of the marquee competition is the growing clout of bat in a contest between wood and leather!

Many expected the bloom of T20 cricket to drastically alter the way 50-over cricket would be played, if not make it redundant completely. While it would be an interesting analytical breakdown in understanding the contribution of shortest format of the game in recent years, the dynamics of ODI cricket have indeed changed remarkably. This is directly visible in the upward trend for batting averages across World Cups since 2003 [2003 - 27.84, 2007 - 29.42, 2011 - 29.18, 2015 - 32.91]; bowling economy rates too seem to follow a similar increment [2003 - 4.76, 2007 - 4.95, 2011 - 5.03, 2015 - 5.65]. Although neither corresponds to an exponential rise, there is a noticeable deviation from linearity.

The additive confluence of the player maturity to the T20 game and the heavily biased rules in favour of batsmen has meant that players, spectators and analysts have started perceiving the ODI game much differently. The consequence was clearly visible during the World Cup (2015) with teams following the template of keeping wickets in hand and going berserk in the last 15 starting with the powerplay around the 35th-36th over; in a subtle manner inversing the 15-over field restriction rule before 2005! Additionally the use of two balls has meant that softness of the balls in the death overs may not be hindrance to scoring big at the back-end. It has resulted in the commonly pointed out development of teams looking to double their scores from the 35th over mark.

Do the statistics concur with this observation? The average deliveries taken to score half of total scores (>300 runs only) during the recently concluded World Cup are 189.9 (approx. 31.4 overs). As anticipated and discussed above, lesser deliveries are taken to double the score while setting up totals and the midway lies around 32.4 over mark. In instances of batting second, the halfway point hovers around 27.1 overs and shouldn’t surprise analysts, as big chases are often associated with keeping track of the required run-rate from the start. When 300+ totals were recorded, 6.2 wickets were lost on an average and in concurrence with the observed template, only 2.1 wickets fell when teams recorded half of their eventual totals.

As against the 28 totals of 300 or more in the present World Cup, only 17 such scores were compiled in 2011. The average 300+ total in 2011 was 327.3, while it compounded to 337.7 in the 2015 edition. Interestingly the halfway mark in that tournament for such totals was 30.2 overs. The first innings doubling happened when 31.1 overs were bowled and 26.3 overs during run-chases.  On an average 6.8 wickets were lost in 300+ totals and 2.3 when half the runs were scored.


These numbers on comparative introspection can suggest unremarkable differences and be attributed to the greater efficacy of the new ball on harder Australian/New Zealand tracks than in the sub-continent. The other conclusion could be presence of the additional fielder inside the circle contributing to the raised stats. Pitches and boundary dimensions in Australia were supposed to suit bowlers more than those in New Zealand but 15 out of the 28 triple hundred scores were recorded in Australia. The rules have been modified in the last decade with the motive of stimulating interest in the middle overs as all the key action was perceived to happen only in the first and last 10 overs. 

While this World Cup has left us with plenty of memories, it leaves room for a massive potential loophole with the major highlighted action (50% runs and 66.67% wickets falling in 36.67% deliveries for 300+ totals) happening only at the extended back-end of the innings, which undermines the objective of the modification in the rules. Already some respected names in the fraternity have advocated for changes to certain rules to accommodate the bowlers and avoid the ODI format from becoming too batsmen-centric and hopefully shouldn’t be too long before leather starts catching up with wood!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Cricket Embrace The 5 Rings?

Another glorious edition of the Olympics goes into the sunset. A couple of weeks that showcased the best athletes compete for the ultimate glory, an event that exhibited disappointment, defeat, joy, pride, victory, glory and a portrait that had participation from 204 nations! A rich history, a massive platform, unparalleled glory and probably the biggest show sports can offer, makes an Olympic Games edition stand out. Ardent cricket fans/followers would feel left out from this marquee sports event. Unlike Motorsports, Cricket is a recognized by the International Olympic Committee. Though cricket wasn’t an outright success in multi-sport models previously, times have changed and today cricket has its T20 avatar to offer for such events. The ICC has 105 countries as its recognized members, spanning continents and covering most of the globe.

Adieu Rahul Dravid

It could have been timed better, it could have come a little later, it could have been better celebrated but the retirement was always going to come some day. It is easier said than fathomed - the Indian test side without Dravid! The news on first instance was a moment of disbelief, followed by a moment of daze before logic struck saying that it had to come and the moment had indeed arrived. Dravid was never a glamorous character on or off the field, more of a thorough gentleman commanding respect from all quarters. His announcement was synonymous with his usual self - calm, composed, dignified and non-fussy. Dravid was, is and will always be remembered as a role model for his conduct, dignity, selflessness  on the cricket field & off it  along-with his technically impeccable batting. On the global scene the game has lost one of its modern-day great and an all-time legend. The clock was ticking for Dravid much before, but an exceptional tour of England postponed this event (

More Than Just An Aberrational Dip

As the team’s head to London for the final test of the series, 2-1 is not an unimagined scoreline at the beginning of the tour and in most ways is a fair reflection of superior execution of skills. The nuances though have a different story to tell - some of England's top performers of this series have emphatically over-achieved (given form and/or ability), while those rated highly in the visitor's camp have grossly under-performed. The form or the lack of it, of two young, promising Indian batsmen has been a source of pronounced scrutiny, disappointment & poor form for the batting unit. While Pujara's problems are restricted to lack of conversion, Kohli is struggling to even getting to that stage. Yes the openers have failed consistently and the lower middle order hasn't provided that assuring cushion, but given Pujara's attributes & Kohli's dream batting form, averages of 25.87 & 13.50 respectively are frustrating for themselves, the team &